Jump to content

The RennTech.org community is Member supported!  Please consider an ANNUAL donation to help keep this site operating.
Click here to Donate

Welcome to RennTech.org Community, Guest

There are many great features available to you once you register at RennTech.org
You are free to view posts here, but you must log in to reply to existing posts, or to start your own new topic. Like most online communities, there are costs involved to maintain a site like this - so we encourage our members to donate. All donations go to the costs operating and maintaining this site. We prefer that guests take part in our community and we offer a lot in return to those willing to join our corner of the Porsche world. This site is 99 percent member supported (less than 1 percent comes from advertising) - so please consider an annual donation to keep this site running.

Here are some of the features available - once you register at RennTech.org

  • View Classified Ads
  • DIY Tutorials
  • Porsche TSB Listings (limited)
  • VIN Decoder
  • Special Offers
  • OBD II P-Codes
  • Paint Codes
  • Registry
  • Videos System
  • View Reviews
  • and get rid of this welcome message

It takes just a few minutes to register, and it's FREE

Contributing Members also get these additional benefits:
(you become a Contributing Member by donating money to the operation of this site)

  • No ads - advertisements are removed
  • Access the Contributors Only Forum
  • Contributing Members Only Downloads
  • Send attachments with PMs
  • All image/file storage limits are substantially increased for all Contributing Members
  • Option Codes Lookup
  • VIN Option Lookups (limited)

Recommended Posts

Recently I purchased a '97 Boxter with a tiptronic and the optional 17" wheels M396 option, while I was driving home I checked the digital speedo with a GPS unit and found that the reading on the car was 4mph higher than the GPS which I have found to be dead on in my wifes Audi A4. On a stetch of highway with the Odo check signs I found that the odo was correct over a 5 mile stretch, has anyone else had any experience with this problem? Any advice on what to do about it other than setting the cruise 4mph higher.

Link to post
Share on other sites
    You can remove these ads by becoming a Contributing Member.

Nothing new my friend, mine is too! It has been discussed on here a number of times, so maybe do a search?? Incidentally, i mentioned this to my OPC and they say there is no way of 'calibrating' them! They basically said that as it was within 10%, dont worry about it! Cr*p hey???.......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mine is 3 m.p.h. off. Actually, when checked with an accelerometer, it was 2.6 to be exact. I have a larger tire on the car than stock. My fronts are 235/40-17 Toyo RA1 instead of the stock Michelin 205/45-17 rubber that came with the car.

I also first noted the difference when I got my sat nav (TomTom) and was curious about the actual difference. Most "officials" will tell you the GPS system as used by commercial entities is not accurate to better than 3 meters or so (I think that's the right number), and better than that is only for military use. They can't guarantee it is accurate. However, even mil-spec sat nav isn't going to be as accurate as an accelerometer.

Also interesting is the digital and analog speedometers on my car are exactly 1 m.p.h. off from each other. The digital is 2.6 and the analog is 1.6.

-Michael

Link to post
Share on other sites
Again, very common. Mine too is off by 2-3 MPH when checked agains my Garmin Nuvi 680. True for my Porsche and Ford Explorer.

Thanks for the info to all of you, being a newbie to the Boxster this is one of the little things I hadn't heard about before.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I posted this a while back but it explains why the error is there and why fixing it is hard.

************************************************************************

I spoke with a friend familiar with the instrument cluster system.

The cluster controller receives a speed signal, typically CAN data from another vehicle controller, and then converts this via an algorithm into both the digital display value and the pointer position. It appears to be a linear function but it doesn't have to be; for example the graphic scale could be expanded on the lower range, of middle range, or upper range, depending on the manufacturer requirements. In the case of my S, such graphical trickery could be useful as the scale covers 175 mph in a 180 degree sweep and is pretty much useless as a ticket avoidance device. The difference between 35 and 40 is pretty hard to see. And also note that the display and pointer position are hopefully matched to avoid user complaints.

To cover any manufacturing tolerance in the dial graphics, and to insure the legal tolerance range is met (remember that tire model, wear, and inflation all have influence), an offset in the algorithm function can be introduced by the system designers, the goal being a skewed tolerance to make sure you don't get a ticket for going 64 when your speedometer says 60. The instrument controller algorithm is not adjustable by mortals. The odometer may or may not have the same issue as it may be driven by a different algorithm and there is no skewed tolerance concern. Having said that I've checked my odometer on long distance trips and it seems to be plus about 4 miles every 100.

It could be possible to trick the system with different tire size, or by finding the source of the speed signal and assuming it counts pulses from a toothed wheel, add or subtract pulses, but this would only fix a specific speed error at one point because such a 'fix' would introduce a percentage of value error and the speedo would only be accurate at the one point where both the curves cross. For example, if as built it is always ~~4mph high. If I increase the tire size by 6.25%, then at 64mph the indicated speed and actual speed would be equal. However, at 120mph indicated, actual speed would be greater, and at 30mph indicated, actual speed would be lower.

An interesting subject but not an easy fix apparently.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.