Jump to content

Welcome to RennTech.org Community, Guest

There are many great features available to you once you register at RennTech.org
You are free to view posts here, but you must log in to reply to existing posts, or to start your own new topic. Like most online communities, there are costs involved to maintain a site like this - so we encourage our members to donate. All donations go to the costs operating and maintaining this site. We prefer that guests take part in our community and we offer a lot in return to those willing to join our corner of the Porsche world. This site is 99 percent member supported (less than 1 percent comes from advertising) - so please consider an annual donation to keep this site running.

Here are some of the features available - once you register at RennTech.org

  • View Classified Ads
  • DIY Tutorials
  • Porsche TSB Listings (limited)
  • VIN Decoder
  • Special Offers
  • OBD II P-Codes
  • Paint Codes
  • Registry
  • Videos System
  • View Reviews
  • and get rid of this welcome message

It takes just a few minutes to register, and it's FREE

Contributing Members also get these additional benefits:
(you become a Contributing Member by donating money to the operation of this site)

  • No ads - advertisements are removed
  • Access the Contributors Only Forum
  • Contributing Members Only Downloads
  • Send attachments with PMs
  • All image/file storage limits are substantially increased for all Contributing Members
  • Option Codes Lookup
  • VIN Option Lookups (limited)

demonz

Contributing Members
  • Posts

    17
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by demonz

  1. Let's look at that: The LN engineering unit sells for about $595 (retail) and is projected to last 40-50K miles (about the typical clutch life in manual M96 cars). So you would go through three LN units in about 120-15K miles, at a cost of $1785. Most of the cars I see in my shop do less than 10K miles a year, and many do less than 2K. Using 6.5K as a very generous "average mileage" for the cars I see, and 40K for the expected time to replacement for the LN unit (at clutch replacement time), you would be replacing the LN unit (on average) every 6 years or so, or three times over around 18 years; well beyond the life expectancy of these cars. This Spanish unit costs nearly the same amount as three LN units for this one unit, and has a "warrantee" for three years............and you view this as "fair"?

    I would be the first to say the design is "interesting", but the warranty, and the fact it is from a small foreign manufacturer does not impress me, nor does the rather extreme pricing……….

    If you account for labor of doing the LN 3 times, then the Isario is cheaper. Unless that is, you work for free :P The Isario is expensive, but comes with a warranty. And the LN aint cheap neither. IMO they're both overpriced. Com'on it's a bearing.

    FWIW, I have no affiliation with either kit.

  2. Personally I'd go with Jake. Adding power does nothing to correct design problem in the M96. Great piece on the M96 in Excellence by the late great Jim Pasha a coupla three issues ago.

    The 996tt does not use the m96, rather it uses a Gt1 derived motor which is also in the Gt2 and Gt3 and 997tt.

    IMHO one pays now or one pays later. If money is a concern, and that is the case here, the only fiscally responsible choice is 996tt. You'll never get anywhere close to your "investment" dollars back from a replaced motor. 996tt is a proven winner.

  3. I was wondering what would happen if at high speed the engine failed for whatever reason (like a cracked sleeve, thrown rod, IMS failure, etc...) which locked up the rear end for a second or two and caused some instability/sliding.... would the PSM and ABS still function to help the driver bring the car under control until it gets stopped?

  4. I did the math on this and I got some strange results. Is this because the rev ranges for my 986S are not the same as those listed, or are there multiple ignitions (like an MSD box) during a single power stroke? Can someone verify please...

    Foremost assumption: Given a Porsche motor that is 4 stroke and 6 cylinders, I get 3 ignitions per rev.

    Now I am religious about shifting BEFORE 7200 rpm (usually 6800 rpm), yet my DME tells me that I recently had 5672 ignitions in Range 1! Crunching the numbers equates to roughly 15 sec. of over revving!!! That's impossible from my experience. If anything I might have bumped it maybe for a second or two. Also, I am the sole driver of the car. What gives? Either my math is wrong, my tach is funky, there's MSD type ignitons, the DME is fudging, or the ranges are lower for my 986S.

    I've ran into the limiter before, and I could feel the power get pulled out. Though I've never tried, I would imagine this would safeguard against "normal" over-revs into ranges 2-6, assuming no mis-shifts and just plain old acceleration from the accelerator pedal.

    Something doesn't add up. I do hope you get a favorable judgement saraf... at least you are enjoying the car again. :D

  5. The key is preventing detonation. I read some where (Corky's Maximum Boost?) most any commercially viable automobile engine was designed with a minimum of 2X safe power rating. That is, rods, crank, case. et. al are all capable of enduring a 100% power increase, in theory. Detonation (from shoddy gas) in a NA motor will produce pressures well beyond those encountered in a +100% HP optimally tuned turbo motor, therefore motors are designed with these safety margins. Problem is, the boxster motors, and all M96 derivatives, may not be all that viable in the first place. Cracked liners, slipped sleeves, failed IMS, and cracked heads are known weak points and well documented (http://www.autofarm.co.uk/engines/water_cooled). These casting flaws will determine how far you can push your motor. Depending on who you ask these flaws may be called design flaws or production flaws. Not muddying the waters, flaws are flaws. Hopefully you have a flawless motor.

    Keep us posted.

  6. well i now they got these for the vr6(VW) motor. im trying to fab together a turbo kit for my boxter. Now iver heard that they have high comp. and have attendency to blow under boost. so i figured if my buddy can machine a head spacer for me i might be able to work somethine out besides getting a rebuild or a turbo motor swap. Let me now if any of you have heard of this being done. do you think timing would be a big issue. Ive had this thing for about 4 years now and i havent found much information on any turbo kit besides ones that are $20k. Im not woried about fitment or anything else because ill be making all my own parts. I am worried about tunning but ive heard of a few places that i might be able to get that done. if you guyes now anything on this let me know.

    thanks :huh: :huh: :)

    Here's a kit $6-8k depending on your set up, http://turbowerx.com/

    A spacer works on many other cars, I don't see a reason why it wouldn't work for the Boxster. Considering the motor will have to be cracked anyway, the extra expense of forged pistons may be worth it. The pluses would be, timing won't be affected and they'll be a lot more tolerant of detonation and tuning mistakes. For $700, it's cheap insurance and you get the exact CR to boot.

  7. -- Check control wire for A/C relay, pin 2 (terminal 85), for short circuit to ground.

    1. Remove A/C relay.

    2. Remove DME control module connector.

    3. Connect ohmmeter to ground and pin 2

    (terminal 85).

    Display: infinite ohms

    If 0 - 5 ohms is displayed, check wiring for chafing and

    pinching damage.

    I'm having difficulty with step 2, locating " DME control module connector" . It a rat's nest of wires, anyone know which connector block it's in? Or do I just trace back from terminal 85 and look for chaffing?

    Thanks.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.