Jump to content

Welcome to RennTech.org Community, Guest

There are many great features available to you once you register at RennTech.org
You are free to view posts here, but you must log in to reply to existing posts, or to start your own new topic. Like most online communities, there are costs involved to maintain a site like this - so we encourage our members to donate. All donations go to the costs operating and maintaining this site. We prefer that guests take part in our community and we offer a lot in return to those willing to join our corner of the Porsche world. This site is 99 percent member supported (less than 1 percent comes from advertising) - so please consider an annual donation to keep this site running.

Here are some of the features available - once you register at RennTech.org

  • View Classified Ads
  • DIY Tutorials
  • Porsche TSB Listings (limited)
  • VIN Decoder
  • Special Offers
  • OBD II P-Codes
  • Paint Codes
  • Registry
  • Videos System
  • View Reviews
  • and get rid of this welcome message

It takes just a few minutes to register, and it's FREE

Contributing Members also get these additional benefits:
(you become a Contributing Member by donating money to the operation of this site)

  • No ads - advertisements are removed
  • Access the Contributors Only Forum
  • Contributing Members Only Downloads
  • Send attachments with PMs
  • All image/file storage limits are substantially increased for all Contributing Members
  • Option Codes Lookup
  • VIN Option Lookups (limited)

Identifying 2.5 or 2.7 motor


Recommended Posts

Recently acquired a 1999 986 where the owner noted that the motor had previously been replaced by Porsche under warranty. The mileage they identified it was replaced at would put it at the work having been done around 2001 or 2002. I assume they would have put a crate 2.5 back in the car for sake of ease and less impact to replacement, however there were notes on a few of the IMS reference materials out there on the net that Porsche used whatever was being produced at the time.

 

Is there a way to identify if Porsche replaced it with a 2.7? I know the O2 sensors and the AOS changed for the 2.7 vs the 2.5 and was going to start there, but unsure if those parts can be successfully swapped from the 2.5 to 2.7. Essentially looking to identify if I have a dual row IMS bearing without opening it up and poking around.

 

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
4 minutes ago, Derek Grozio said:

Recently acquired a 1999 986 where the owner noted that the motor had previously been replaced by Porsche under warranty. The mileage they identified it was replaced at would put it at the work having been done around 2001 or 2002. I assume they would have put a crate 2.5 back in the car for sake of ease and less impact to replacement, however there were notes on a few of the IMS reference materials out there on the net that Porsche used whatever was being produced at the time.

 

Is there a way to identify if Porsche replaced it with a 2.7? I know the O2 sensors and the AOS changed for the 2.7 vs the 2.5 and was going to start there, but unsure if those parts can be successfully swapped from the 2.5 to 2.7. Essentially looking to identify if I have a dual row IMS bearing without opening it up and poking around.

 

Thanks!

 

Welcome to RennTech :welcomeani:

The answer to your questions is yes, Porsche would have put a reman 2.5L engine back in the car, that is their policy.  As for the IMS bearing, it would have been whatever was being used at the time of the engine reman, and 2000-2001 was a transitional period where they were moving from the dual row to the single row.  For the good news, you can read the engine number off the sump rail and decode what engine it is, the IMS bearing is another issue, and may require visual inspection (pulling everything apart to see which one it is).  There are no other proven ways to determine which bearing is in an engine from that period., you simply have to go look.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.