Jump to content

Welcome to RennTech.org Community, Guest

There are many great features available to you once you register at RennTech.org
You are free to view posts here, but you must log in to reply to existing posts, or to start your own new topic. Like most online communities, there are costs involved to maintain a site like this - so we encourage our members to donate. All donations go to the costs operating and maintaining this site. We prefer that guests take part in our community and we offer a lot in return to those willing to join our corner of the Porsche world. This site is 99 percent member supported (less than 1 percent comes from advertising) - so please consider an annual donation to keep this site running.

Here are some of the features available - once you register at RennTech.org

  • View Classified Ads
  • DIY Tutorials
  • Porsche TSB Listings (limited)
  • VIN Decoder
  • Special Offers
  • OBD II P-Codes
  • Paint Codes
  • Registry
  • Videos System
  • View Reviews
  • and get rid of this welcome message

It takes just a few minutes to register, and it's FREE

Contributing Members also get these additional benefits:
(you become a Contributing Member by donating money to the operation of this site)

  • No ads - advertisements are removed
  • Access the Contributors Only Forum
  • Contributing Members Only Downloads
  • Send attachments with PMs
  • All image/file storage limits are substantially increased for all Contributing Members
  • Option Codes Lookup
  • VIN Option Lookups (limited)

Ride high with RoW 030


Recommended Posts

hey there,

those who got RoW 030, could you tell me the ride high of your suspension setting?

the meassurement, ground to the beginning of the wheelhouse.

I got the following setup, Front: 65,8cm and Back: 65,3cm.

Why this question, because Xeno, told me a different ride high on his 030 suspension setting.

cheers,

Tony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thx Arthur,

I found this on that site:

quote from karlooz:

"front - 646mm/25.4" - 225/40-18 conti sport contact 2 97.5% tread left

rear - 654mm/25.75" - 265/35-18 conti sport contact 2 95% tread left

H&R sport springs w/ stock shocks"

I got almost identical values on my RoW 030 as karlooz C2 w/ H&R springs!

Is that possible that 030 suspension +/- value differe that much to the value of -10mm?

cheers,

Tony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scouser,

I don't know if the ride heights are good or bad, but I just need to find out if theese results are the standard values for the RoW 030 w/ original springs.

WOW, do you really driving with 2 different brands/tire profile on yours!?!

we are not even allowed to drive mixed Michelin Pilot Sport N0 + N1 here in Germany!

btw, I didn't know that Goodyear F1 tires are approved by Porsche?

cheers,

Tony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a a great article around suspensions for the 996 on the Porsche Club of America's website.. It's called :

996 Standard andSport suspensions analyzed

and they are comparing the USA versions ( standard and 030 option) to the ROW M030 options. Very interesting article,.

See if the following link works for you:

http:/www.pca.org/panorama/sample_article_3.html

Bottom line :American suspensions are softer and the car is up to 3 centimeter higher... It can be changed...it only takes money . Around 2K dollars

Good luck!

HarryR996 ( 1999) C2 with 030 option and 18 inch wheels

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wow, very interesting indeed!

but I didn't expect that a tolerant of +/- 10mm for various installation/modell, I personally think this tolerant is to high though.

another thing mentioned are the tires in the back, using 285/30 instead of 265/35 will makes by calculation -7,25mm different in the back, of course this also depends on how wide the rims are.

quote from the article:

"We have heard semiofficial scuttlebutt that Porsche does not believe USA drivers are as tolerant of a stiff ride and low ground clearance as European drivers, so this could be a factor."

Could that be the reason?

cheers,

Tony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Toni,

your calculation is almost correct:

The ride hight with 285/30 vs 265/35 is 3.6mm lower, not 7.25mm.

The wheel outer diameter is 7.25 mm different, but for the ride hight you only count the radius, not the diameter.

Cheers,

Wolfgang

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.